The two articles you just read contain conflicting conclusions. What questions do you have about the information presented in the articles? Maybe there’s something you would like to know more about before making your own conclusion. Or perhaps there’s an item that was presented as a fact that you would like to investigate. Before you make your conclusion about human involvement in climate change, list four to five questions that you would like answered.

1. georgia constitution is adopted 2. radical reconstruction ends in georgia 3. atlanta becomes the official state capital 4. jefferson franklin long becomes the 1st black congressman from georgia what is the correct sequence of events? a) 1, 3, 2, 4 b) 1, 2, 3, 4 c) 3, 1, 4, 2 d) 4, 2, 3, 1

Read the paragraph and answer the question that follows: the town of belmond, iowa, needs to add weather sirens. the loud and steady wail would warn citizens of approaching danger. if past history is an indication, the sirens will save hundreds of lives. with a prediction of a deadly storm season, the alert which sentence should be revised to eliminate redundancy? the town of belmond, iowa, needs to add weather sirens. the loud and steady wail would warn citizens of approaching danger. if past history is an indication, the sirens will save hundreds of lives. with a prediction of a deadly storm season, the alert system is needed immediately.

Are people more motivated to change from positive or negative experiences, like slavery, womens rights, and any other historical movements/moments? i need more factual information than opinions.