I have two quick questions that I need help with. I will mark brainliest on my favorite answer. (you will get reported if you use the sample answer from edmentum, or if you don't answer both questions) QUESTION 1:

- Based on your own knowledge and what you’ve learned in the tutorial, explain in one to two sentences how US involvement in the SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR* represented a shift from isolationism to intervention.

(*link: https://app. edmentum. com/redirect//47454)

QUESTION 2:

- Based on your own knowledge and what you’ve learned in this lesson, explain in one to two sentences how US involvement in WORLD WAR II* represented a shift from isolationism to intervention.

(*link: https://app. edmentum. com/redirect//347289)

I really appreciate it! Thanks!

Why do drivers have difficulty seeing side traffic at t-intersections in rural areas?

Which region on the map would have been directly affected by the infestation of the boll weevil in the late-19th and early-20th centuries? a) 5 b) 4 eliminate c) 3 d) 2

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.