Imagine the u. s. congress is considering legislation that will ban mtbe, a substance added to gasoline to reduce emissions. this legislation was proposed due to complaints from citizens and interest groups who believe mtbe is a health threat. in a well-written paragraph, analyze whether the benefits of creating this ban are worth the costs. use examples from the module to support your answer.

Banning MTBE would be beneficial because it would reduce the emissions released from gasoline engines. When breathing in these emissions, can cause impaired lung function and also lung cancer. As well as health issues, these emissions could cause a fire because it's a flammable material. I do think that this ban is worth the cost because allowing for this ban on the MTBE would reduce health and lung issues in individuals who live in urban areas and are constantly surrounded by this substance added to gasoline.  

Explanation:

this headline suggests that midterm congressional   elections are at the corner and trump administration wants to activate his base by vowing to clamp down on immigrants and immigration as trump had said during his election campaign around two years ago. when a baby is born in usa, the baby becomes citizen of usa for 85 years and trump wants to end this rule of birthright citizenship to control illegal immigration and this what he said in an interview""we’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the united states for 85 years, with all of those benefits,” "