What was one major result of the north’s victory in the civil war?

The major result of the victory of the North was based on many factors. One of the results was the supremacy of the National Government was upheld.

Further Explanation:  

There are several factors which led to the victory of the north in the Civil War. The population of North was 22 million but the population of South was 9 million in which half of them were slaves. The North was industrially more powerful and the USA had a large percentage of raw materials i.e. 94% of the pig iron and 97% of firearms.  

The North was very richer and has varied agriculture than the southern countries. The Union has a bigger Navy and army which has blocked efforts of the confederacy to trade with European countries. The Confederacy were of the view that France and Britain will come to their aid and rescue because of the necessity of cotton. The northern countries have sufficient amount of cotton.  

The northern countries controlled shipping, railroad avenues that permitted them in trading and get supplies fairly. The slaves went to the Union armies which provide them with more manpower which helped them in industries. The Lee’s offensive war policy led to huge casualties that destroyed a larger part of the Confederate army. It killed many army men and civilians.  

Learn More:

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Civil War

Subject: Social Science

Keywords: Population, pig iron, firearms, bigger navy, shipping, manpower, offensive war policy.

the earthquake in haiti was a magnitude of 7.0 according to the u.s geological survey yet the smaller earthquake in haiti killed more than 200,000 and left more than 1.2 million people homeless. the chile earthquake was a magnitude of 8.8 and 500 times more stronger but chile's earthquake only injured 712 people.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.