A state court can exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant if the defendant a. had minimum contacts with the state. b. had maximum contacts with the state. c. drove through the state at least once in the past five years. d. has a relative living in the state.

a. had minimum contacts with the state.

Explanation:

Usually, a long-arm statute would give a court jurisdiction over a non-resident if the person has limited interaction within the jurisdiction of the court. The supreme court maintained that, in order for the defendant to have minimal contacts, there is a requirement for two of the following factors:

every society, in order to meet the needs of it's people, has to answer three basic questions:

- what should we produce?

- how should we produce it?

- for whom should we produce it?

this questions must be answered in order to, option b, aid in production decisions.

every country can't produce everything, no matter how rich their land is. it may be a matter of technology, resources or geographical conditions. so, these three questions must be resolved in order to get the most of the production of each land.

hope this !

it looks like its all of the above. [.wpal1kojopfdpojfrfionrnif.knfdsnksjosjo]

explanation:

you have to combine all of your answers together to

.wpal1kojopfdpojfrfionrnif.knfdsnksjosjo