subject
Social Studies, 24.04.2020 15:47 pennygillbert

Write an introduction outlining the basic argument of state powers versus national powers. You may want to turn to the Constitution itself to find material. Write a brief summary of why each document was written. What is the historical context of the documents? You will probably want a paragraph for each document. Write a paragraph of what the two documents have in common. Write a paragraph of what the difference in the two documents is. How does the "South Carolina Exposition and Protest" differ in its argument from the "Kentucky Resolution"?Write a conclusion that answers whether or not a state should have the ability to nullify a national law, and if so, under what circumstances? If not, why not? This last paragraph will be your opinion, but remember do not use "I" in any form. State your opinion as if it were fact.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00
Alarge increase in gas prices creates a demand for cars with good gas milage. it takes months for car companies to make these cars. how do you describe this market for cars
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00
Why is cheating in college wrong? expecting a good answer about it a good opinion. you.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30
Acurb of this color means you may not stop a) yellow b)green c) red d) blue
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Write an introduction outlining the basic argument of state powers versus national powers. You may w...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 12.02.2021 02:40
question
Chemistry, 12.02.2021 02:40
Questions on the website: 13722360