Is it better to be aggressive, intolerant to the other party, and pushy or is it better to be very courteous to the other courtroom workgroup actors and try to compromise?

It is better to be very courteous to the other courtroom workgroup actors and try to compromise.

Explanation: The foundational concept of a courtroom workgroup is associated with plea bargaining. Furthermore, collegiality (companionship and cooperation between colleagues) is a very important cornerstone of a courtroom workgroup.

Intolerance and aggressiveness is out of place in a courtroom workgroup and most often makes for a negative outcome.

Both has great consequences, but the first statement is better

Explanation:

The first statement is better off because it can be settled ,what ever is causing aggressiveness,intolerance and pushy can be settle and forgiven, but what ever has been taken to court to settle has gone beyond recompense, also trying to compromise the other party in court can be so bad because if you finally succeed , what ever the outcome maybe, it is of great consequence and it can have much impact in the other party. There are some actions that can be addressed instead of going to court and trying to compromise the other ,that is why I prefer the first statement, as intolerance and aggressiveness can still be settled compared trying to compromise other party in court room

we need an attachment to see what you are talking about.

they could find out our specific needs.