Describe two fundamental beliefs of judicial restraint judges. describe two fundamental beliefs of judicial activists. choose any landmark supreme court case and explain how the majority opinion in that case reflected judicial activism.

1.- Judicial restraint judges:

They usually are more traditional  and they have a very strict interpretation of the constitution.

2.- Judicial activists:

They are not as traditional as the restraint judges and they  have a loose interpretation of the constitution .

3.-

Brown vs Board of Education is a case where most of the people were in favor of ending segregation. This reflects judicial activism because a judicial conservative would've wanted to keep segregation because in the constitution it states that the "separate but equal" statement and they wanted to do as the constitution said. Judicial activist argued against that saying that it they were not separate but equal educational systems.

answer; ///i believe that the correct answer is (d) when each house of congress passes a different version of a bill and those difference must be

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.