How did the supreme court rule in the miranda decision?
ernesto miranda was found guilty on all counts.
ernesto miranda had been denied his rights.
ernesto miranda could not be tried twice for the same crime.
ernesto miranda did not have the right to avoid self-incrimination.

An experimenter is examining the relationship between age and self-disclosure. a large sample of participants that are 25 to 35 years old and participants that are 65 to 75 years old are compared, and significant differences are found with younger participants disclosing much more than older people. the researcher reports an effect size of .34. what does this mean

Erika is a human resource manager at bluetel inc., a software company. she receives a call from an hr manager at another software company asking about marshall, a software engineer who used to work at bluetel and has applied for a job at the caller's company. erika checks the company's records and sees that a coworker had accused marshall of racial discrimination, but an investigation did not turn up any evidence to support the charge. marshall left the company two months later, saying he was no longer comfortable there. erika is concerned about sharing the details of this situation with the caller. if telling the information to the caller leads to the other company not hiring marshall, what potentially unlawful behavior could marshall accuse bluetel of engaging in?

Why were colonist mad about the tea act if it actually lowered the price of tea