Too much information at once is confusing, smaller, more manageable sessions are easier to understand and retain true or false

Throughout united states history, new groups of people have been given voting rights. this usually occurs through

Will award brainliest if it is done correct and answered ! : )part 1–list and describe all the ways an election affects a community. one example appears for you. some citizens volunteer their time to with a candidate’s campaign. part 2–answer the following questions in your own words. what are the requirements to vote in concord city (and most of the united states)? what is an ideology? how does it relate to voting? how does it relate to political parties? explain the differences between liberal, moderate, and conservative. what would you add to this list of things to consider when choosing a candidate? explain your answer. background and education family issue positions personality and character political party membership social group memberships work experience which item from the list above do you think is most important to consider when voting for a candidate? explain why. what are the media? how do the media play an important role in elections? give an example from the concord city election. what is bias? explain an example of bias you witnessed in the concord city election. what is symbolism? explain an example of symbolism you witnessed in the concord city election. what is propaganda? explain an example of propaganda you witnessed in the concord city election. in your opinion, which candidate was most successful in the debate? which one impressed you the most? which one was a disappointment? explain your responses. part 3–fill in the following chart with the appropriate labels. one appears for you. part 4–rank each candidate 1–5 for their success in each of the categories that follow. instructions: a “1” indicates little to no success, and a “5” indicates a high level of success. category rita republican norman no-tax elaine environs david democrat background and education family issue positions personality and character political party membership social group memberships work experience debate political ads website (fill in your own category) total of rankings for each candidate

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?