Carla, a bright, energetic 8-year-old, has lost four gloves during the past few weeks. her mother is annoyed at the need to keep replacing gloves. carla notices that her little brother is amused that carla is in trouble, and she formulates the theory that her brother is stealing the gloves just to get her into trouble. carla is convinced that she is right. she refuses to entertain her mother's suggestion that carla is often so distracted that she does not keep track of her possessions. carla is displaying a form of

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

do all equestions have to be answered