A food inspector examined 16 jars of a certain brand of jam to determine the percent of foreign impurities. The following data were recorded: 2.4 2.3 3.1 2.2 2.3 1.2 1.0 2.4 1.7 1.1 4.2 1.9 1.7 3.6 1.6 2.3 Using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution, perform a sig test at the 0.05 level of signigicance to test the null hypothesi that the median percent of impuritites in this brand of jam is 2.5% against the alternatie that the median percent of ipurities is not 2.5%.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Type the correct answer in the box. function f, shown below, is translated down 3 units and left 4 units to create function g. f(x)= 3|x-2|-5 fill in the values of a, h, and k to write function g

Answer for 10 points show work you guys in advanced < 3