It’s system of equations but it needs to be solved in substitution if you can answer I’ll give five stars

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Does the problem involve permutations or? combinations? do not solve. the matching section of an exam has 4 questions and 7 possible answers. in how many different ways can a student answer the 4 ? questions, if none of the answer choices can be? repeated?

Jorge planted flowers in his garden he planted one row of 12 tulips and one row of 36 daisies george's friend kylie has a garden with 75 flowers in it kylie's garden only contains tulips and daisies. is it possible for kylie‘s garden she have the same ratio of tulips to daisies as george's garden?