Water enters a lake at the rate of 2 cubic kilometers per day. Water evaporates from the lake at the rate of 1.2 cubic kilometers per day, and the dam at the end of the lake regulates the flow so that the volume in the lake stays at a constant 245 cubic kilometers. The water entering the lake contains 2.9 tons of salt per cubic kilometer, and the water leaving the lake is well mixed. The differential equation for the amount of salt in the lake, measured in tons, with time measured in days, is. a) Q' = 8.41 - 0.00 163 Q b) Q' = 8.7 - 0.00816 Qc) Q' = 4.2 - 0.0049 Qd) Q' = 5.8 -0.00327 Q

answer: i guess 5 units?

step-by-step explanation:

i recommend you do what your heart desires. if you're attracted to the same gender, then you're attracted to the same gender. you can't determine what your heart wants.

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

54, jfvhgnjhvnjhcbnncjigjm