Given: lens and ngth are parallelograms.
prove: zlezt
reasons
1. given
statements
1. lens and ngth are parallelograms.
2. zl zens and zgnh - zt
3.2
4. zlezt
2.?
3. vertical angles are congruent.
4. transitive property of congruence
part
what reason justifies the second statement in the proof?
(1 point)
in a parallelogram, consecutive angles are supplementary
alternate interior angles theorem
in a parallelogram, opposite angles are congruent.
corresponding angles postulate

step-by-step explanation:

answer: c, the green line

step-by-step explanation:

there is no black line, eliminate b.

simple interest implies periodic payments, but the red line shows no payments, eliminate d.

simple interest has equal payments. if paid say every day, the graph is about a straight line (actually a stairstep).

the yellow line is not straight, eliminate a.

check: the green line is straight, answer is c.

simple interest with positive interest rate gives a straight line sloping up to the right. green line:

g(t) = $100 + ($200-$100) ÷ (20 years) × (t years)

= $100 + (4%/year) × ($100)(t years)

incidentally, the yellow line curving upward represents continuously compounded interest

y = $100 × 2^(t years / (14 assuming the yellow line hits $200 at 14 years. 2^0 is 1, so y(0) = $100; 2^(14/14) is 2, so y(14) = $200.

60%