subject
Mathematics, 19.07.2019 21:30 agabu38

Vance used the associative property to write (4.5m+7/8)-9 as the equivalent expression 4.5(7/8-9). did vance apply the associative property correctly? why or why not? yes, the terms with variables should be written first. yes, the terms can be regrouped and still be equivalent. no, the order of the terms should have been changed. no, the addition symbol was dropped in the second expression

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 12:30
And employees salary increase by $4500 which represents a 15% raise what is the employees new salary
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
Agroup of randomly selected apple valley high school students were asked to pick their favorite gym class. the table below shows the results of the survey. there are 528 students at apple valley high school. gym class number of students racquet sports 1 team sports 9 track and field 17 bowling 13 based on the data, what is the most reasonable estimate for the number of students at apple valley high school whose favorite gym class is bowling? choose 1 answer a. 9 b. 13 c. 119 d. 172
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Item 1 solve for s. s+24=90 βˆ’114 βˆ’66 66 114
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:00
Mrs. blake's bill at a restaurant is $42.75. she wants to leave the waiter an 18% tip. how much will she pay in all, including the tip?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Vance used the associative property to write (4.5m+7/8)-9 as the equivalent expression 4.5(7/8-9). d...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 13.02.2021 21:10
question
Mathematics, 13.02.2021 21:10
Questions on the website: 13722362