subject
Law, 17.03.2020 20:27 natalievick03

Expedia, a third-party online travel-booking company proposed an acquisition of Orbitz, another third-party online travel-booking company. Several hotel companies and consumer advocates objected on the grounds that the result would be that the merged company would control 75% of the third-party online booking business. What standard will the Justice Department apply in determining whether to approve the merger? a. the quality of service at Orbitz b. the views of the hotels and consumer advocates c. whether the merger will affect competition d. the fairness of the merger terms

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 16.07.2019 02:30
You find a body in a kitchen with undigested eggs and bacon in its stomach. knowing the victim had a set routine they followed most mornings, what would you then check to most narrow in on the time of death? what time the victim’s alarm clock was set to that morning what time the victim goes to work that morning what time the victim usually ate breakfast what time the victim usually took a shower in the morning.
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 14:10
Which of the following is not a potential distraction that could negatively impact your fitness to drive? a. passengers b. technology c. emotions d. traffic lights
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:20
Asubject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. how should the investigator proceed, with respect to the irb, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? a. do not report the adverse drug experience to the irb since it is a common adverse experience. b. report the adverse drug experience to the irb only if there are several other occurrences. c. report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. d. report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the irb's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the irb
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30
Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Expedia, a third-party online travel-booking company proposed an acquisition of Orbitz, another thir...
Questions
question
History, 18.08.2019 12:30
Questions on the website: 13722363