subject
History, 13.11.2019 05:31 rosepotato789

Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a historian?

a. they can summarize a huge amount of data that a historian could not sort through alone. b. they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted. c. they can compare and contrast conclusions other historians have made about a time period. d. they can a historian focus on important themes rather than on a specific piece of evidence.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
The stamp act: was passed by parliament in 1776 caused the boston massacre was the first direct tax levied by england on the colonists sparked protest in the colonies
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:50
How did the international community respond to south africa’s policies in the 1980s?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
How did the commercial whaling industry affect whaling practices of the makah people?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:20
How are the processes of asexual reproduction and sexual reproduction different? check all that apply.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a hist...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.07.2019 14:00
question
Mathematics, 29.07.2019 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722367