How was john marshall interpretation of the constitution different from thomas jefferson's?

The correct answer is Marshall believed the Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.

Marshall’s interpretation of the Constitution was different from that of Tomas Jefferson’s in that is Marshall believed the Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.

John Marshall was a federalist. Jefferson was not. He was an anti-federalist. Then, John Marshall considered the idea of a strong central government. On the other side, Jefferson thought that a strong government was not the best option for a new nation and even worse, a strong federal government could turn into a tyranny.  

b. parliament was weaker than the monarchy.

i know social security wasn't one.

explanation:

hope my answer has you!