Which of the following best explains the u. s. supreme court decision in bush v. gore? (3 points) it decided that florida's first recount should resume in all disputed counties until completed and bush was the winner. it decided that the florida supreme court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and bush was the winner. it decided that the florida supreme court decision to hold a new recount was appropriate according to the constitution. it decided that florida's first recount was against the constitution and states cannot order recounts in any future election.

its B

Explanation:

I did the test and this was the answer

the completion of the erie canal spurred the first great westward movement of american settlers, gave access to the rich land and resources west of the appalachians and made new york the preeminent commercial city in the united states.

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation: