subject
History, 25.08.2021 08:30 acavalieri72

Is this evidence adequate support for the idea? Why or why not? (A) Yes. Options 1 and 2 provide readers with necessary background and option 3 is directly supportive.
(B) Yes. The evidence provides a variety of examples of things that economists do unrelated to money.
(C) No. Option 3 is excellent evidence to use, but options 1 and 2 are too similar to support the
argument.
(D) No. The evidence provided is not specific or thorough enough to fully support the argument.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 12:30
What city was taken back by sumerians in 2100 bc
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Montezuma was taken prisoner by the spanish and held captive for months while the spanish ransacked the city of tenochtitlan. what was the fate of montezuma? a he escaped only to be cut down in battle.b he reasoned with the spanish and got them to leave the city.c he died of old age while in the custody of cortes.d he was struck with stones trying to plead for peace with his people and it is reported he died a few days later.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
During the 1920’s why did the us policy change
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
The diagram shows fossils buried in layers of rock. which conclusion is best supported by the diagram?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Is this evidence adequate support for the idea? Why or why not? (A) Yes. Options 1 and 2 provide r...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 18:14
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 18:14
question
English, 05.05.2020 18:14
Questions on the website: 13722363