The ruling in Marbury v. Madison . . . Chief Justice John Marshall established the three principles of judicial review: (1) the Constitution is the supreme law of the land; (2) the Constitution must be followed when there is a conflict with any other law; and (3) the judicial branch can declare laws unconstitutional. . . . Marshall helped broaden the power of the Court. He also expanded federal power at the expense of the states. In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Court held that Congress does have implied powers and that states cannot tax the federal government. In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Court held that federal law overrules state law in matters affecting more than one state. . . . In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Court decided that states could not regulate Native Americans. Only the federal government had that power. —Discovering Our Past: A History of the United States Use this passage to answer question 1 1 Which phrases from the passage support the argument that Marshall was a Federalist?
Select all that apply.
A) "helped broaden the power of the Court" B) "established the three principles of judicial review" C) "expanded federal power at the expense of the states" D) "decided that states could not regulate Native Americans" E) "held that federal law overrules state law in matters affecting more than one state"

124QWEestablished the three principles of judicial review: (1) the Constitution is the supreme law of the land; (2) the Constitution must be followed when there is a conflict with any other law; and (3) the judicial branch can declare laws unconstitutional. . . . Marshall helped broaden the power of the Courestablished the three principles of judicial review: (1) the Constitution is the supreme law of the land; (2) the Constitution must be followed when there is a conflict with any other law; and (3) the judicial branch can declare laws unconstitutional. . . . Marshall helped broaden the power of the CourWEQ

Explanation:

he judicial branch can declare laws unconstitutional. . . . Marshall helped broaden the power of the Court. He also

- "the past is made of multitudinous items ranging from anything that can be collected, recollected or assessed to originate in the past. as such, the past is a gallimaufry of particulars that may not have been related in any way. however, the human mind seeks organization to understand concepts and other things. the human mind therefore seeks relationships in explaining and studying the past. history being a humanity, dictates that historians have to serve this human trait by bringing structure to details of the past. historians do this by creating interpretive frameworks that capture as many details as possible."

< 3