subject
History, 17.03.2021 23:50 kenoknox

Which conclusion below best illustrates the correlation between the fact that Britain and France had the two largest empires AND they were on the winning side of the war by 1919? A. Germany attempted to offset the British naval empire by increasing its own naval capacity, but
this didn't work out and so led to Britain being on the winning side.

B. Britain and France had fewer raw materials and resources at their disposal, so they couldn't contribute more the war effort and therefore not have a better chance of winning

C. Britain and France had more raw materials and resources at their disposal, so they could contribute more to the war effort and therefore have a better chance of winning

D. Imperialism wasn't that influential in the startup of the First World War, so there is no correlation here:​

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
How did france’s tax policies contribute to the french revolution?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:10
What does it mean in the declaration of independence for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which two activities did soldiers carry out as a part of their routine during the civil war? taking care of horses training slaves educating women cleaning weapons
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
Most members of the socialist party of america believed that the government should protect workers by: a.) operating big businesses. b.) outlawing strikes. c.) outlawing unions. d.) all of the above.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which conclusion below best illustrates the correlation between the fact that Britain and France had...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 10.11.2019 03:31
Questions on the website: 13722360