How does human error or oversight change the way humans complete research and other activities?

All human activity arises from the initiative, understanding and reasoning of the person who carries it out. Thus, even scientifically proven research has a large human factor component, in the sense that its interpretation is none other than that perceived by researchers.

Therefore, human error is a constant possibility in all research, given that despite the existence of verification methods, these are still verified by humans and are therefore fallible.

In conclusion, human error can affect any investigative method, because imperfection is an integral part of human nature.

the answer is d the rejection of the olive branch petition.

explanation:

the olive branch petition was an attempt to state the rights of the colonists while keeping their loyalty to the british crown. hope this !

by kd

in which two ways were the northeast woodland indians and the southeast indians similar? both collaborated to form the iroquois confederacy. both cultivated the crops of corn, beans, and squash. both lived in rich environments of swamps and rivers. both lived in tree-bark dwellings called wigwams. both expected men to hunt, while women farmed.