Introduction: Match each part of the Lemon Test to its meaning. neutral
avoiding acting with religious purposes
unentangled
avoiding advancing or stopping religion
secular
avoiding unnecessary ties to religion

Neutral - avoiding advancing or stopping religion.

Unentangled - avoiding unnecessary ties to religion.

Secular - avoiding acting with religious purposes .

Explanation:

The Lemon Test is a test used in court cases after the Supreme Court judgment that details any legislation that concerns religion and public issues. This test derives its name from the lead plaintiff Alton Lemon who argues against the government's acts in trying to inhibit a person from expressing his religious beliefs.

In this test, the terms used in this legal test are as follows-

Neutral- which indicates that the government should not advance or stop any religious purposes.

Unentangled- the government must also avoid any unnecessary ties to any particular religion.

Secular- It must also avoid acting with any religious purpose.

me on my last question.

during the debate over his landmark energy policy proposal, president jimmy carter failed to consult one of the most powerful senators, louisiana’s russell long, who would have a big say over whether the legislation moved through the upper chamber. this was classic carter. with a strong distaste for congressional politics, the president simply refused to do what most other presidents would consider routine, such as courting key senators. long became so irate with the president that when he was finally invited to a white house dinner, he stood up to ask a question and, before doing so, proceeded to sarcastically introduce himself: “i’m russell long, chairman of the senate finance committee.”

this interaction is a revealing moment in stuart e. eizenstat’s fascinating new history of carter’s presidency. the former peanut farmer from georgia was a president who, according to conventional wisdom, didn’t care much for party politics; nonetheless, in eizenstat’s view, carter’s legacy on domestic and foreign policy has been vastly underappreciated. the author paints carter as a “bold and determined” leader who bravely attacked the challenges of his time. eizenstat goes so far as to argue that carter might very well be the most successful one-term president in american history.