subject
History, 21.05.2020 06:00 AmbitiousAndProud

Why are secondary sources often useful?
O
A. They are less likely to be objective.
O
B. They provide a broader perspective on a historical event.
C. They are written by people who experienced events directly.
D. Their descriptions are more colorful than those of primary
sources.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
How did the first punic war differ from the second punic war
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
The directory was unsuccessful and was eventually replaced because no constitution had been created that outlined its authority. it was connected with the reign of terror. its members did not get along with napoleon. the national convention did not agree with the directory's decisions.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
John locke viewed the social contract as a choice or "consent of the governed", where the people possess the power to change government. how did thomas hobbes see the social contract? man is born in chains, but can be set free through good deeds. man is born happy, but becomes more miserable as he ages. man is born poor, but can rely on other individuals for security. man is born selfish, but can give up some freedom in return for security provided by the government.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:50
How did the international community respond to south africa’s policies in the 1980s?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Why are secondary sources often useful?
O
A. They are less likely to be objective.
O<...
Questions
question
History, 26.04.2020 01:16
question
Mathematics, 26.04.2020 01:17
Questions on the website: 13722363