subject
History, 22.04.2020 19:07 elevupnext1100

An effect of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Scott v. Sandford was that
A. legal protection for slavery was strengthened..B
B. legal protection for slavery was weakened.
C. the abolitionist movement was strengthened.
D. the Missouri Compromise was strengthened.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
When was the us construction written
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What ideas, institution, and causes became the focal points of chinese and islamic resistance respectively to the west in the latter half of 19th century and the first decades of the 20th
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:20
The british commonwealth is: a. the national treasury. b. the british social services system. c. an alliance of former british colonies. d. a shared land for grazing sheep in britain.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Why were presidents andrew jackson and martin van buren unwilling to annex texas? a. they did not want texas to be admitted to the union as a slave state. b. they feared that the annexation of texas as a slave state would lead to political problems within the union. c. they thought that texas was too large to be admitted to the union as one state. d. they did not believe in the idea of manifest destiny.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
An effect of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Scott v. Sandford was that
A. legal protection for...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 25.06.2019 08:10
question
Social Studies, 25.06.2019 08:10
Questions on the website: 13722367