subject
History, 12.03.2020 18:54 jdodger5165

What did the Supreme Court decide in Miranda v. Arizona?
O
A. Miranda was not guilty of the crime he was accused of.
O
B. Confessions are not reliable evidence in criminal cases.
O
C. People accused of a crime must be informed of their rights.
O
D. The police must share all information about a crime with
suspects.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
Chief justice earl warren stated, “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” what did the use of “inherently” imply about segregation? 1/ by its very definition, it cannot be equal. 2/ it is an integral part of american society. 3/ based on its meaning, separation is a natural inclination. 4/ it was intended to be a state right, not a national mandate.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
What was going on with south asia before europeans came ?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
What does the term “escalation” refer to?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
What statement characterizes japan’s economy during the meji restoration?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
What did the Supreme Court decide in Miranda v. Arizona?
O
A. Miranda was not guilty of...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 01.03.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 01.03.2021 14:00
question
English, 01.03.2021 14:00
question
Computers and Technology, 01.03.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722367