Consider the following statement: the support of non-native alaskans was an important factor leading to the settlement of alaska native land claims. is this conclusion consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block? answer yes or no, and then explain your choice in one or two sentences.

Yes. The support of non-Native Alaskans was an important factor which lead to the settlement of Alaska Native land claims. It is consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block.

Explaination:

The non-Natives Alaskans knew how the Natives Alaskans were dealt with in the Southeastern United States. They learnt from their mistakes so took a different approach when dealing with the natives from Alaska. The U.S. Courts were more sympathetic towards the natives due to past history. The federal government was in favor to help the native which was not so in the past.

greenland

c tundra

iceland is grassland

explanation:

an oligopoly is a term used to clarify the structure of a particular market, industry, or organization. a market is considered oligopolistic or amazingly focused when it is shared between a few companies.