%
5. which is one way that people benefit from equal treatment under the law?
a each person can decide certain laws for himself or herself.
b each person has the same chance for a basic public education.
<
oc each person can choose not to participate in the common good.
d each person can take away certain freedoms of another person.
titution
stitution

Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.

Ea ch person has the same chance for a basic public education.

Explanation: There are many benefits people can achieve under the equal treatment of the law. According to the law people or citizen of a country has the same and equal basic rights to enjoy.No one can deprive them from these rights if the constitution and the law secures the right.

But among the given options on question, option A does not match the benefits equal treatment under the law. Because, no one can decide certain laws for themselves individually. The constitution decides the law for the citizens. Option D also does not match the benefit of the equal treatment of law. Because,as an impact of the equal treatment of the law no one can take away the rights of another person. It is against the law.

But the under the equal treatment of the law each person has the same chance for a basic public education.Because if the constitution says that each person has the right to acquire the basic public education then the citizens of all level has the rights to enjoy this.

Therefore, the answer is option B.

the china one is last

explanation:

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.