In article i, section 10, clause 3, states are forbidden from keeping a standing army or navy. why would the constitution restrict a state from “keeping a standing army”?

The United States Constitution limits states from keeping a standing army because the framers wanted all military personnel to be under the control of the US federal government.

Before the US Constitution was implemented, the Articles of Confederation was the law of the land. At this time, states had significant power and the US federal government struggled to have any states follow the orders of the federal government. This was especially true for developing a military, as it was optional to listen to the laws of the federal government.

When developing the US Constitution, the framers knew it was an element that needed to be changed. Now, all military would be under the control of the federal government. This would ensure that the US is ready for war and would have a cohesive unit ready for action.

- "friedan's attitude towards what she calls the 'feminine mystique' is that she sees the ideal of femininity as stiffing women's potential in the 1950's. betty friedan was a writer and activist of the 1950's and 60's."

< 3

for the 2 countries u can do china and america because america has a democratic government while china has a communist government.

a democracy is a government run by the people either by directly voting or indirectly by electing representatives. an oligarchy is a government run by a few or a small group of people. a democracy and oligarchy are similar because both in an oligarchy and an indirect democracy, a small group of induvial determine the laws for a large group of people they are different because in an oligarchy it is easier to control and they do not have to answer to a large number of people in the country, unlike a democracy where they do have to answer to a large number of people an county that is a democracy would be the united states. a country that is an oligarchy would be the china.