1. the iranian revolution that brought ayatollah ruhollah khomeini to power in 1979 resulted in part from which factor? a. growth of influence from arab neighbors. b. resistance to islamic fundamentalism. c. anger at western interventions. d. nationalization of various industries. 2. how did industrialization spur european imperialism in the nineteenth century? a. european nations sought sources of raw materials for industry b. european businesses needed larger workforces. c. european citizens depended on competition to win better wages. d. european rulers required more land to house excess populations. 3. how did manifest destiny deepen divisions among u. s. citizens? a. by igniting debate over the expansion of slavery. b. by undermining calls to defend the annexation of texas. c. by forcing native americans to move westward to reservation lands. d. by empowering a national

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation:

yes they have. but is this a true false question? if it is, the answer is true.