Apit bull once bit my sister. all pit bulls should be banned because they are dangerous. a. this is a logical statement based on experience and fact. b. this statement is not logical because pit bulls don’t bite people. c. this statement is not logical because it is not using enough evidence. d. this is a logical statement that uses strong wording to make its point.

The correct answer is C. This statement is not logical because it is not using enough evidence.

Explanation

When someone wants to declare his/her position from some situation she or he needs to present enough evidence or truthful information taken from reliable sources like scientific studies, statistics or test results, to back up his/her position because statements based only in personal experiences cannot be considered logical. According to the above, in the case of the statement of the question it can be considered as a personal experience because it presents a personal situation with pit bulls and tries to use that situation as a justification for the prohibition of pit bulls, nevertheless, this is not considered logical because does not present information from reliable sources. So the correct answer is C This statement is not logical because it is not using enough evidence.

i could of w this question but i don't see a " passage " .

~

sorry ! ):