Write one or two questions for my reviewers about the third paragraph. Write questions that encourage reviewers to comment on the style or tone.

Passage:
Ban the Tan
Ah, it's the first brilliantly sunny day of the summer. You're heading for the beach. You've got your towel, water, radio, and money for a snack. You're set. Wrong! You've forgotten the most important thing: sunscreen.

"Hey, I never burn," you say. "I never use sunscreen." Well, it's time for a radical change. Even if you have really dark skin and never get sunburned, you're still getting plenty of dangerous ultraviolet (UV) rays. These cause serious damage to all skin types, from the palest white to the darkest black.

Hey, you gotta be careful. 'Cause if you're not, here's what can definitely happen. You get ugly, leathery and wrinkled skin that's old before its time, and you might end up with something even scarier: skin cancer. This is disgusting nightmare material!

Why all this fanaticism about the sun all of a sudden? People have been living with it forever, right? There are several reasons why we're so much more concerned. There is a lot more skin cancer than there used to be. Scientists say this is in part because the earth's ozone layer is being depleted. The ozone is a natural UV-ray blocker, and exposure to too much UV radiation can lead to skin cancer. If we don't stop using chemicals that deplete the ozone layer, skin cancer will increase even more. The biggest culprits in ozone depletion seem to be a group of chemicals called CFCs. They have been widely used in refrigerators, air conditioners, and in production of electronic components. Substitute chemicals are available, but not everybody is using them—especially not in third-world countries. We need worldwide treaties to ban CFC use and stiff regulations to enforce them. It's still not too late to save the ozone layer, but if we ignore the problem it will be.

So what can you do to protect yourself from the sun besides staying inside and away from windows (those UV rays penetrate glass unless it has a special coating)? You can practice these safe sun habits recommended by authorities like the American Cancer Society, American Academy of Dermatology, and The Skin Cancer Foundation.

Try to stay out of the sun when it's strongest (from 10 a. m. to 4 p. m.).
Use sunscreen, every day. Be sure it's broad-spectrum and protects against UVA and UVB rays.
Wear a hat when you're in the sun, for more protection.
Wear sunglasses. They look cool and they help protect your eyes.
Try to cover up your body as much as possible. Clothing adds another barrier.
Don't use sunlamps! The sunlamp's artificial sun causes damage too.
Get to know your skin by examining it often so that if any precancerous conditions pop up you'll know enough to see a doctor.
This seems like a lot to deal with, but once you get in the habit it's pretty simple to be sun safe.

taking into account that a theme is the central topic a text treats and can be developed through a story, play, poem etc. the following are themes that can be further developed:  

my best friend jeffrey has many unusual interests. (the story could be about each of the unususal interests)

once a man gives his soul over to evil, he can never go back. (this could be a saying or a proverb)

the three sheepdogs lay around the yard all day. (it could be developed detailing how each of these sheepdogs lay around)

a priest's collar has an unusual effect upon people. (it could be developed detailing the different effect upon people)

innocence is a powerful force in a world full of corruption. (it could be developed detailing how is a world full of corruption)

king lear is a play shakespeare wrote later. (it is just a sentence and doesnt give any idea or topic to be discussed in details.

evil often wears the disguise of innocence. (this could be a saying or a proverb)

the correct answer is dilapidated.

hope this (:

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this