What additional information would most strengthen these instructions? describing what a bow looks like listing the common brands of bows explaining the goal at the beginning of the text evaluating the types of arrows used in archery

This question is missing the instructions. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:

Read these instructions.

First, check your bow to make sure that it does not have any cracks and that the string is fitted tightly. Second, select an arrow from the quiver. Once you have chosen an arrow, clip the end of the arrow onto the middle of the string. Turn to face the target. Keeping your back straight, pull the string back until it is almost touching your cheek. Next, sight along the arrow at the bull’s-eye at the center of the target. When you are ready, release the string.  

What additional information would most strengthen these instructions?  

describing what a bow looks like

listing the common brands of bows

explaining the goal at the beginning of the text

evaluating the types of arrows used in archery

The additional information that would most strengthen these instructions is:

C. explaining the goal at the beginning of the text.

Explanation:

The beginning of the text is quite abrupt. We are told, all of a sudden, to look for cracks in our bow. We take a brief moment to think about what kind of bow the passage refers to. Once this is done, we can assume that "bow" in the text refers to the piece of flexible wood and string used to shoot arrows (instead of a beautiful knot made with fabric, for instance). However, it would have been nice to have contextualization. The instructions would be more effective from the start if readers were told they are being taught to shoot arrows with the purpose of hitting a target. Thus, the best option is:

C. explaining the goal at the beginning of the text.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

participle: dressed; modifies: bride.