If judicial decisions were strictly political, how might you expect the vote on every case to come out ?

The vote will favor the political party that appointed the judges, especially if the party is still in power when the judicial decisions are made.

Explanation:

In some corrupt climes, we can see this play out heavily.  Even in the US, some politicians expect justices to read their lips when delivering judgements.  But this cannot be.  It will be totally unfair to base judicial decisions on political affiliations and alliances.  Justices are not appointed to represent the political party that appointed them.  They are appointed to render fair justice using the prevailing laws of the land and on the equality of all persons.

this is not english work

explanation:

it is math

we know that, volume of a rectangular prism is given by :

✿   {length × width × height}

given : the length of rectangular prism = 5.5

given : the width of rectangular prism = 6

given : the height of rectangular prism = 3

⇒ the volume of given rectangular prism = {5.5 × 6 × 3}

⇒ the volume of given rectangular prism = 99