English, 23.04.2020 21:43 Miloflippin9766

2) How would you compare Zimbardo's argument that situations cause people to act in bad
ways in "What Makes Good People Do Bad Things?" to Nietzsche's philosophical thoughts on
morality in "Morality as Anti-Nature"?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

In the text, "What Makes Good People Do Bad Things?" Philip G. Zimbardo argues that everyone has the capacity to commit evil. He defends the idea that people are neither "good" or "bad," but that instead, people are pulled into either direction as a consequence of their circumstances. Some of the elements that Zimbardo uses as catalysts for "evil" behaviour are deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.

Nietzsche's argument in "Morality as Anti-Nature" shares some commonalities with Zimbardo's view. Nietzsche also believes that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. He also defends the power of ideologies, such as morality, in shaping behaviour. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche does not necessarily think that people should strive to listen to the good and stay away from the bad. He believes this to be an absurd precept of morality. Instead, he wants people to stop thinking on this terms and instead practice understanding and approving of every part of us.

Answer from: josuemartinez1030

Nietzsche says that morality is not something natural to our organism, while Zimbardo believes that morality is a construction of the environment that surrounds us.

Explanation:

For Nietzsche, morality is not something that exists naturally in human beings, we are not born with an already established moral code, we do not maintain morality in all situations. For this reason, we are always desiring the destruction of something or someone, no matter the degree of our morality, since even Christians desire the destruction of some groups of people.

For Zimbardo, on the other hand, morality arises in relation to the environment that surrounds us. For this reason, it is necessary for us to stimulate our sense of justice and not to tip or place morality as the certainty that we will be just and moral.

Answer from: Quest

Ithink the answer should be 4 because this is the best one . i hope my answer you
Ineed . i need this answer. which number is main idea?

Answer from: Quest

Conclusion is the answer

Another question on English

English, 22.06.2019 01:00

Read the passage from animal farm. "that was part of the arrangement! " cried squealer. "jones's shot only grazed him. i could show you this in his own writing, if you were able to read it. the plot was for snowball, at the critical moment, to give the signal for flight and leave the field to the enemy. and he very nearly succeeded—i will even say, comrades, he would have succeeded if it had not been for our heroic leader, comrade napoleon. do you not remember how, just at the moment when jones and his men had got inside the yard, snowball suddenly turned and fled, and many animals followed him? and do you not remember, too, that it was just at that moment, when panic was spreading and all seemed lost, that comrade napoleon sprang forward with a cry of 'death to humanity! ' and sank his teeth in jones's leg? surely you remember that, comrades? " exclaimed squealer, frisking from side to side. now when squealer described the scene so graphically, it seemed to the animals that they did remember it. at any rate, they remembered that at the critical moment of the battle snowball had turned to flee. but boxer was still a little uneasy. how does the characterization of squealer support the author’s purpose? squealer's dramatic accusations draw parallels between him and stalin’s propagandists. squealer's uncertainty shows that he is not a reliable ally of napoleon and is ineffective with messaging. squealer's ability to get the animals to listen to him shows that any animal can rise to be a leader in time. squealer's humble interactions with the animals reflect the importance of equality and cooperation.

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 09:30

The word stiff is a synonym for the word limber. o o false true

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 10:30

Which word in this excerpt from act i, scene i, of richard iii means “to listen”

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 13:30

Read the passage from chapter 17 of the prince. and of all princes, it is impossible for the new prince to avoid the imputation of cruelty, owing to new states being full of dangers. hence virgil, through the mouth of dido, excuses the inhumanity of her reign owing to its being new, saying: "res dura, et regni novitas me talia cogunt moliri, et late fines custode tueri."(*) nevertheless he ought to be slow to believe and to act, nor should he himself show fear, but proceed in a temperate manner with prudence and humanity, so that too much confidence may not make him incautious and too much distrust render him intolerable. . against my will, my fate a throne unsettled, and an infant state, bid me defend my realms with all my pow'rs, and guard with these severities my shores. what reasoning does machiavelli use in this passage? machiavelli uses deductive reasoning by first introducing the conclusion that new rulers must be cruel and then supporting it with evidence. machiavelli uses deductive reasoning by starting with statistical evidence and then concluding that rulers must be cruel. machiavelli uses inductive reasoning by first presenting an observed pattern of details and then concluding that new rulers must be cruel. machiavelli uses inductive reasoning by starting with the conclusion that new rulers must be cruel and then supporting it with short narratives.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

2) How would you compare Zimbardo's argument that situations cause people to act in bad
ways i...

Questions