Can someone explain to me what i have to do here? you, much appreciated! : )

20 points and brainliest plz . 2 based on the initial facts of the case, make an inference or an educated guess as to who you believe is the person guilty of defacing the andrew wyeth painting. explain your reasoning. 3 what additional facts or clues did you gather in part 2 of the story? state at least three additional relevant facts or clues you learned in part 2 of the story. 4. why is mrs. williams clearly the guilty party in this case? what motivated her to ruin the wyeth painting? explain how the facts of the case led you to this final deduction.

In keats's "ode to a nightingale," to which of the following methods does keats not turn in his attempt to reconnect imaginatively with the "melodious bird"? - poetry - white wine - opium - sparkling red wine

Awell-worded thesis statement is both and generally acceptable . . broad agreeable . . limited significant . . limited significant . . broa