Which source would be most useful for a reporter covering the safe use of animals in film-making? reviews of movies that feature live animals in important roles a book about the careers of famous film dogs, such as lassie and rin tin tin "no animals were harmed," a webpage explaining how the american humane association advises movie studios "black beauty: how a movie changed the way we treat horses," an article in a magazine about animal care and support

In looking at all of the possible responses for this question, the webpage titled, “No Animals Were Harmed” that explained how the American Humane Association advises movie studios would be the best option for a reporter covering the safe use of animals in film making.  Reviews of movies that feature live animals would not be useful because reviews are opinionated and would address the acting and such, only.  A book about the careers of famous film dogs would not be useful because they would focus on the daily dealings and stardom of the animals and be focused on specific dogs, not the general safety of all animals used in films.  Lastly, the article about how the movie _Black Beauty_ changed the way horses are treated would not be too helpful either because it would be about horses only and their treatment outside of film, not animals, in general, and their safety in the making of movies.

which of the following was specifically permitted by the emancipation proclamation?

free african americans were allowed to fight for the confederacy.

free african americans were allowed to enlist in the union army and navy.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to move to the north.

enslaved people in border states were allowed to become confederate citizens.bg j5yrn ehti5wrq4iu h3r etu