subject

The sender side of rdt3.0 simply ignores (that is, takes no action on) all received packets that are either in error or have the wrong value in the acknum field of an acknowledged packet. Suppose that in such circumstances, rdt3.0 were simply to retransmit the current data packet. Would the protocol still work? (Hint: Consider what would happen if there were only bit errors; there are no packet losses but premature timeouts can occur. Consider how many times the nth packet is sent, in the limit as n approaches infinity).

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Computers and Technology

question
Computers and Technology, 22.06.2019 06:50
Match the personality traits with their description
Answers: 1
question
Computers and Technology, 22.06.2019 21:30
How do you take a green screen out of the video while editing?
Answers: 2
question
Computers and Technology, 23.06.2019 01:30
How do you set up a slide show to play continuously, advancing through all the slides without requiring your interaction? a. click set up slide show, and then select the loop continuously until ‘esc' and show without narration options. b. click set up slide show, and then select the loop continuously until ‘esc' and use timings, if present options. c. click set up slide show, and then select the show presenter view and use timings, if present options. d. click set up slide show, and then select the show without animation and browsed at a kiosk (full screen) options.
Answers: 3
question
Computers and Technology, 24.06.2019 10:30
You're programming an infinite loop. what must you include in your code to prevent crashes? in roblox
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The sender side of rdt3.0 simply ignores (that is, takes no action on) all received packets that are...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.02.2021 06:50
question
Mathematics, 19.02.2021 06:50
question
Mathematics, 19.02.2021 06:50
Questions on the website: 13722361