2.34 Translate function f into MIPS assembly language. If you need to use registers $t0 through $t7, use the lower-numbered registers first. Assume the function declaration for func is "int func (int a, int b);". The code for function f is as follows: int f (int a, int b, int c, int d) { return func(func(a, b),c+d); } ! Write a function in C that finds the maximum value of an integer array: m = max (int * a, int n) and then convert it to MIPS assembly language. Make sure the C and MIPS source code are well documented. Add a comment to every instruction of the max() function relating the statements in the C code.

Write a program that uses a widgetviewer object to do the following: generate two random integers between 1 and 9 (inclusive). name one of them x, the other y. display them to the user using jlabel objects. create a jlabel object displaying the text "enter an operation number." create a jtextfield for the user's input. create a jbutton displaying the text "press here when you've entered your operation." use addandwait to add it to the widgetviewer object. when the user clicks the jbutton, evaluate operation in the following order to determine the one and only mathematical operation to perform on x and y. use a jlabel to display the result. if operation is between 1 and 10 inclusive, add x and y. if operation is evenly divisible by 4, subtract y from x. if operation is evenly divisible by 5, use integer division to divide y into x. if operation is an even number, use floating point division to divide y into x. if none of the other tests on operation apply, multiply x and y. note: operation can be negative or zero.

Which syntax error in programming is unlikely to be highlighted by a compiler or an interpreter? a variable name misspelling a missing space a comma in place of a period a missing closing quotation mark

When making changes to optimize part of a processor, it is often the case that speeding up one type of instruction comes at the cost of slowing down something else. for example, if we put in a complicated fast floating-point unit, that takes space, and something might have to be moved farther away from the middle to accommodate it, adding an extra cycle in delay to reach that unit. the basic amdahl's law equation does not take into account this trade-off. a. if the new fast floating-point unit speeds up floating-point operations by, on average, 2ă—, and floating-point operations take 20% of the original program's execution time, what is the overall speedup (ignoring the penalty to any other instructions)? b. now assume that speeding up the floating-point unit slowed down data cache accesses, resulting in a 1.5ă— slowdown (or 2/3 speedup). data cache accesses consume 10% of the execution time. what is the overall speedup now? c. after implementing the new floating-point operations, what percentage of execution time is spent on floating-point operations? what percentage is spent on data cache accesses?