25 points , hi! please look at the attachment for the question, I'm having a hard time because all I have to do is solve through those 2 problems but I'm not sure if I solve the fractions first then multiply that result by 100 or what. I asked my teacher which she helped a little but I don't think she understood where I was lost. If you can help I would really appreciate it. Thank you. This was the set up question:
4. If 100.0g of nitrogen gas (N2) is reacted with 100.0g of hydrogen gas (H2) to form NH3. What is the limiting and excess reactants?
Hint: Convert grams to moles for each reactant and then convert to moles of NH3. You need your balanced equation from answer 1 to determine the mole relationship between each reactant and the product NH3. Use the periodic table to determine the molar mass of all chemical formulas. Fill in the “?” blanks below to show your work.

and in the screenshot it has everything I'm working with and the conclusions I need to draw from it, I can draw the conclusions just fine on my own but I need help solving.

To answer the question, we correctly fill the attached screenshot as follows;

The molar mass of N₂ = 28 g/mol

A. Therefore, the excess reactant is hydrogen gas H₂ because it makes the most amount of ammonia, NH₃ (33. moles of NH₃)

B. The limiting reactant in nitrogen, N₂, because it is the reactant that makes the least amount of the ammonia, NH₃ (approximately 7.143 mol NH₃)

C. The theoretical yield of ammonia, is the maximum amount of ammonium that can be produced from the reaction between the 100 g of hydrogen gas, H₂, and 100 g of nitrogen gas, N₂ which is given by the amount of ammonia produced by the limiting reactant which is approximately 7.143 mole of NH₃

Explanation:

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation: