subject
Business, 15.12.2021 01:00 ciaraberger

ACC 2202; INTERMEDIATE ACCOUNTING QUESTION ONE
Rotich and Sinei have been in partnership for several years, sharing profits and losses in the
ratio 2:1. Interest on fixed capitals was allowed at the rate of 10% per annum, but no interest
was charged or allowed on current accounts.
The following was the partnership trial balance as at 30 April 2018:
Sh.
Sh.
Fixed capital accounts
Rotich
750,000
500,000
Sinei
Current accounts
Rotich
400,000
300,000
S in ei
Leasehold premises (purchased 1 May 2000) 2,250,000
Purchases
Motor vehicle (cost)
Balance at bank
Salaries (including partners' drawings)
Stocks: 30 April 2000
Furniture and fittings (cost)
4,100,000
1,600,000
820,000
1,300,000
1,200,000
300,000
225,000
105,000
550,000
310,000
Debtors
Accountancy and audit fees
Wages
Rent, rates and electricity
General expenses (Sh.352.400 for the six 660,000
months To 31 October 2000)
Cash introduced – Tonui
1,250,000
8,750,000
Sales (Sh.3, 500,000 to 31 October 2000)
Accumulated depreciation: I May 2000
300,000
100,000
1,070,000
13,420,000
Motor vehicle
Furniture and fittings
Creditors
13,420,000
Additional information:
1. On 1 November 2000,'Tonui was admitted as a partner and from that date, profits and
losses were shared in the ratio 2:2:1. For the purpose of this admission, the value of
goodwill was agreed at Sh.3, 000,000. No account for goodwill was to be maintained in the
books, adjusting entries for transactions between the partners being made in their current
accounts. On that date, Tonui introduced Sh.1, 250,000 into the firm of which Sh.375,
000 comprised his fixed capital and the balance was credited to his current account
2. Interest on fixed capitals was still to be allowed at the rate of 10°%, per annum after Tonui
admission, no interest was to be charged or allowed on current accounts.
3. Any apportionment of gross profit was to he made on the basis of sales. Expenses, unless
otherwise indicated, were to be apportioned on a time basis.
4. A charge was to be made for depreciation on motor vehicle and furniture and fittings o4
20%and 10% per annum respectively, calculated on cost.
5. On 30 April 2001, the stock was valued at Sh. 1,275,000.
7. A difference in the books of Sh.48, 000 had been written off at 30 April 2018 to general
6. Salaries included the following partners' drawings:
Sales returns of Sh.32, 000 had been debited to sales returns but had not
, Salaries included the following partners' drawings:
Rotich Sh.150, 000, Sinei Sh. 120,000 and Tonui Sh.62, 500
expenses, which was later found to be due to the following clerical errors:
been posted to the account of the customer concerned;
• The purchases journal had been under cast by Sh.80, 000.
8 Doubtful debts (for which full provision was required) amounted to Sh.30, 000 and Sinos
000 as at 31 October and 30 April 2018 respectively.
8. On 30 April 2018, rates and rent paid in advance amounted to Sh.50,000 and a provision of
Sh.15,000 for electricity consumed was required.
Required:
(a) Trading and profit and loss account for the year ended 30 April 2018,
(b) Partners current accounts for the year ended 30 April 2018.
(c) Balance sheet

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 16:40
Dollywood corporation accumulates the following data concerning a mixed cost, using miles as the activity level. miles driven total cost january 10,000 $16,500 february 8,000 $14,500 march 9,000 $12,500 april 7,000 $12,000 compute the variable and fixed cost elements using the high-low method
Answers: 3
question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30
Alandowner entered into a written agreement with a real estate broker whereby the broker would receive a commission of 10% of the sale price if he procured a "ready, willing, and able buyer" for the landowner's property and if the sale actually proceeded through closing. the broker found a buyer who agreed in writing to buy the property from the landowner for $100,000, the landowner's asking price. the buyer put up $6,000 as a down payment. the agreement between the landowner and the buyer contained a liquidated damages clause providing that, if the buyer defaulted by failing to tender the balance due of $94,000 at the closing date, damages would be 10% of the purchase price. the landowner included that clause because she was counting on using the proceeds of the sale for a business venture that would likely net her at least $10,000. the buyer became seriously ill and defaulted. when he recovered, he demanded that the landowner return his $6,000, and the landowner refused. the broker also demanded the $6,000 from the landowner and was refused. the broker and the buyer filed separate suits against the landowner, with the buyer pleading impossibility of performance. the two cases are consolidated into a single case. how should the court rule as to the disposition of the $6,000?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:30
Suppose you win a small lottery and have the choice of two ways to be paid: you can accept the money in a lump sum or in a series of payments over time. if you pick the lump sum, you get $2,950 today. if you pick payments over time, you get three payments: $1,000 today, $1,000 1 year from today, and $1,000 2 years from today. 1) at an interest rate of 6% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the (lump sum / payments over time), since it has the greater present value. 2) at an interest rate of 9% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the (lump sum / payments over time), since it has the greater present value. 3) years after you win the lottery, a friend in another country calls to ask your advice. by wild coincidence, she has just won another lottery with the same payout schemes. she must make a quick decision about whether to collect her money under the lump sum or the payments over time. what is the best advice to give your friend? a) the lump sum is always better. b) the payments over time are always better. c) it will depend on the interest rate; advise her to get a calculator. d) none of these answers is good advice.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:40
Kumar consulting operates several stock investment portfolios that are used by firms for investment of pension plan assets. last year, one portfolio had a realized return of 12.6 percent and a beta coefficient of 1.15. the average t-bond rate was 7 percent and the realized rate of return on the s& p 500 was 12 percent. what was the portfolio's alpha?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
ACC 2202; INTERMEDIATE ACCOUNTING QUESTION ONE
Rotich and Sinei have been in partnership for...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367