Business, 22.04.2021 18:00 joelpimentel

Establishing a new drug in the market. Bhattacharya and Vogt (2003) study the pricing strategies of pharmaceutical companies that bring new drugs to market. They observe that new drugs often debut at relatively low prices and get more expensive over time. They interpret this strategy as an attempt by the drug company to establish its drug in the minds of doctors and patients before trying to extract monopolistic profits. Recall our fictional drug for carpal tunnel syndrome called BHTn1whichwas introduced in Section 12.1.
Suppose demand for the new drug is Q = 1, 000 â P where P is the price that the monopolistic firm sets. What price will the firm choose to maximize profits ' = PQ? We assume the cost of producing the drug is negligible throughout this problem.
Now suppose that Bhattacharya and Vogt are on to something when they say that drug companies must manage the stock of knowledge about their drug. Imagine a two period model where the drug company is trying to maximize the sum of profits over two periods. In the first period, the monopolistic firm will price low to build buzz about BHTn1, and in the second period the firm will capitalize on its popularity. Demand in year 1 (Q1) and demand in year 2 (Q2)are as follows:
Q1 = 100 â 5P1
Q2 = Q1/10Â· (100 â 5P2)
Note that demand in year 2 is a function of sales in year 1. Find the sequence of prices P1, P2 that the firm chooses to maximize profits ' = P1Q1 + P2Q2. [Hint: Use backward induction. Start with year 2, considering the output in year 1 as given. Then find the year 1 output that maximizes total profit.]
Explain intuitively why your results do or do not match up with the Bhattacharyaâ Vogt hypothesis.
Now assume that the company, if it follows your pricing strategy, will earn P1Q1 in the first year and P2Q2 in every subsequent year while it still holds a patent and can price like a monopolist. Afterwards generic versions of BHTn1 will flood the market and it will earn no more profits. If the company has to invest $60,000 in year 0 to discover the drug, would a 17-year monopoly be long enough for the firm to invest in researching the drug? Assume no discounting.
What if the discount rate is 5%?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 19:20

1. revising for conciseness - eliminating flabby expressions,limiting long lead-ins, and dropping unnecessary fillerstime is money in any business environment. people want information communicated quickly and clearly. to make your writing more concise and understandable, avoid flabby expressions, long lead-ins, and unnecessary fillers. your audience will appreciate your brevity.1. if your writing contains a flabby expression like in view of the fact that, replace it with the word because / although / probably .for each of the following two sentences, choose the best revision.2. i am sending you this letter to inform you that we have experienced an unexpected surprise within our expense sheet, but we are positively certain we will solve it.1) we need to inform you that we have experienced an unexpected surprise with our expense sheet, but we are midway to an end result.2) we have identified a problem with our expense sheet, but we will solve it.3) i am sending you this letter to inform you that we have a problem with our expense sheet, but we are positively certain we have a solution.3. it is the user who should contact the center.1) everyone knows that it is the user who should contact the center.2) the user should contact the center.3) if there is a problem, the user should contact the center.read the following passage, and then answer the question.[1] you scheduled seven conference calls for this morning between 10 and 11 a.m. [2] generally, the company limits the number of conference calls to three per hour. [3] i’m letting you know that in the future, we should be more careful about scheduling.4. which revision limits the long lead-in in sentence 3? 1) in the future, we should be more careful about scheduling.2) i’m letting you know so that in the future we are more careful about scheduling calls.3) so that you know in the future, we should be more careful about scheduling.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 20:00

Suppose a country's productivity last year was 84. if this country's productivity growth rate of 5 percent is to be maintained, this means that this year's productivity will have to be:

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 22:40

In a fixed-term, level-payment reverse mortgage, sometimes called a reverse annuity mortgage, or ram, a lender agrees to pay the homeowner a monthly payment, or annuity, and expects to be repaid from the homeowner’s equity when he or she sells the home or obtains other financing to pay off the ram. consider a household that owns a $150,000 home free and clear of mortgage debt. the ram lender agrees to a $100,000 ram for 10 years at 6 percent. assume payments are made annually, at the beginning of each year to the homeowner. calculate the annual payment on the ram.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 00:40

In 2017, "a public university was awarded a federal reimbursement grant" of $18 million to carry out research. of this, $12 million was intended to cover direct costs and $6 million to cover overhead. in a particular year, the university incurred $4 million in allowable direct costs and received $3.4 million from the federal government. it expected to incur the remaining costs and collect the remaining balance in 2018. for 2017 it should recognize revenues from the grant of

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Establishing a new drug in the market. Bhattacharya and Vogt (2003) study the pricing strategies of...

Questions