Archie runs a small mineral exploration business (as a sole proprietorship). In 2016, he purchased land (for $68,000) where he suspected a magnesium deposit was located. He incurred $18,000 of exploration costs related to the development of the magnesium mine in 2016 and an additional $22,000 of exploration costs in 2017. Archie elected to deduct these expenditures for regular tax purposes in both 2016 and 2017. In 2018, given a decline in magnesium prices, Archie chose to sell the property for $66,000, rather than bring the mine to production. What AMT adjustments are required in 2018 related to mine exploration expenditures and the sale of the land

$4,400 mine exploration expenditures

$2,000 Sales of land

Explanation:

[$66,000 (sales price) - $68,000 (basis) on the sales of property = loss of $2,000

10 years Amortization for mine exploration:

2016 Cost 2017 Cost

Total $18,000 $22,000

Amount

2016 $1,800 -

2017 $1,800 $2,200

2018 $1,800 $2,200

$5,400 $4,400

2016 cost ($1,800 +$1,800+ $1,800) =$5,400

2017 cost ($2,200+$2,200)= $4,400

In 2018 a negative AMT of $4,000 ($1,800+$2,200) are necessary for mine exploration expenditures because

the cost are not deducted during the year in which it was incurred but amortized over 10 years and $2, 000 negative AMT adjustment for the sale of the land

answer; that person may have a larger tax bill to pay on income taxes;

the u.s. census bureau produces data on the population and economy nationwide. it can you to analyze the kind of people living in your neighborhood. it does not show you the market of people willing to buy your product or an existing market for your product. that will require more market research. the census bureau only gives you an insight to the demographics in your area.