Business, 25.02.2020 02:53 helpmeplzz27

Last year, the Miller Company reported a return on assets of 15 percent and an asset turnover of 1.6. In the current year, the company reported a return on assets of 19 percent but an asset turnover of only 1.2. If sales revenue remained unchanged from last year to the current year, what would explain the two ratio results?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

b. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to increase. If total assets increased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to increase.

Explanation:

The options are as follows

a. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to decrease. If total assets decreased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to increase.

b. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to increase. If total assets increased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to increase.

c. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to decrease. If total assets decreased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to decrease.

d. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to increase. If total assets increased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to decrease.

Let us assume the sales is $100,000

So, the asset turnover equal to

Asset turnover = Sales ÷ Total Assets

1.6 = $100,000 ÷ Total assets

Total assets = $62,500

Now the return on assets equal to

Return on assets = Profit ÷ Total Assets

15% = Profit ÷ $62,500

So, the profit is $9,375

Now in the current year

The asset turnover equal to

Asset turnover = Sales ÷ Total Assets

1.2 = $100,000 ÷ Total assets

Total assets = $83,333.33

Now the return on assets equal to

Return on assets = Profit ÷ Total Assets

19% = Profit ÷ $83,333.33

So, the profit is $15,833.33

Now the increase in asset and profit is

Increase in asset = ($83,333.33 - $62,500) ÷ (62500)

= 33.33%

And, the increase in profit is

= ($15,833.33,- $9,375) ÷ ($9,375)

= 68.89%

As we can see that the increase in asset decreased but at the same time the increase in profit increases that results in increases in total assets and the increment in return on assets.

Answer from: Quest

explanation:

jfx

Answer from: Quest

idk just tryinna get some points skskksksks

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 05:40

Grant, inc., acquired 30% of south co.’s voting stock for $200,000 on january 2, year 1, and did not elect the fair value option. the price equaled the carrying amount and the fair value of the interest purchased in south’s net assets. grant’s 30% interest in south gave grant the ability to exercise significant influence over south’s operating and financial policies. during year 1, south earned $80,000 and paid dividends of $50,000. south reported earnings of $100,000 for the 6 months ended june 30, year 2, and $200,000 for the year ended december 31, year 2. on july 1, year 2, grant sold half of its stock in south for $150,000 cash. south paid dividends of $60,000 on october 1, year 2. before income taxes, what amount should grant include in its year 1 income statement as a result of the investment?

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 12:10

Profits from using currency options and futures.on july 2, the two-month futures rate of the mexican peso contained a 2 percent discount (unannualized). there was a call option on pesos with an exercise price that was equal to the spot rate. there was also a put option on pesos with an exercise price equal to the spot rate. the premium on each of these options was 3 percent of the spot rate at that time. on september 2, the option expired. go to the oanda.com website (or any site that has foreign exchange rate quotations) and determine the direct quote of the mexican peso. you exercised the option on this date if it was feasible to do so. a. what was your net profit per unit if you had purchased the call option? b. what was your net profit per unit if you had purchased the put option? c. what was your net profit per unit if you had purchased a futures contract on july 2 that had a settlement date of september 2? d. what was your net profit per unit if you sold a futures contract on july 2 that had a settlement date of september 2

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 17:40

Aproduct has a demand of 4000 units per year. ordering cost is $20, and holding cost is $4 per unit per year. the cost-minimizing solution for this product is to order: ? a. 200 units per order. b. all 4000 units at one time. c. every 20 days. d. 10 times per year. e. none of the above

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 20:40

On january 1, 2017, pharoah company issued 10-year, $2,020,000 face value, 6% bonds, at par. each $1,000 bond is convertible into 16 shares of pharoah common stock. pharoah’s net income in 2017 was $317,000, and its tax rate was 40%. the company had 97,000 shares of common stock outstanding throughout 2017. none of the bonds were converted in 2017. (a) compute diluted earnings per share for 2017. (round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. $2.55.) diluted earnings per share

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Last year, the Miller Company reported a return on assets of 15 percent and an asset turnover of 1.6...

Questions