subject
Business, 12.02.2020 06:22 zhellyyyyy

There would be no separation between one country’s economy and another’s if the entire world

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30
Gary becker's controversial the economics of discrimination concludes that price discrimination has no effect on final profits. price discrimination benefits monopolies. labor discrimination in hiring results in more efficient allocations of production. discrimination in hiring practices has no effect on final profits. labor discrimination harms firms that practice it due to increased labor costs. price discrimination harms monopolies, which refutes over two centuries of economic theory.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:00
Acontractor was awarded a purchase order for commercial items for $1.5 million under the authority of far subpart 13.5. the purchase order was issued in november 2010 and containedall applicable clauses that were current as of the date of the purchase order. under the purchase order, the contractor is required to comply with a small business subcontracting plan that contains all of the required elements. which of the following is true? a.the contractor must submit a standard form 294, subcontracting report for individual contracts. b.the contractor must submit an individual subcontracting report through the electronic subcontracting reporting system (esrs). c.the contractor may submit either an sf 294 or report its subcontracting through esrs. d.the contractor is not required to submit any subcontracting reports.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 02:00
In 1948, the president of the united states earned a salary of $75,000. in 2000, the president earned a salary of $400,000. knowing that the cpi for 1948 is 24.1 and the cpi for 2000 is 172.2, convert the 1948 salary to constant 2000 dollars. when comparing constant dollar amounts, whose salary was worth more--harry truman, president in 1948, or bill clinton, president in 2000
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 09:30
Ronald sees that his employer's stock has grown from $20 a share to $60 a share this year, while most stocks have seen only 5% growth. his employer offers to let him convert a large portion of his salary into stock options. what is not a valid reason to turn down the stock offer? a)stocks with high returns have high volatility, and ronald's company may not grow further. b)ronald may be taxed more for capital gains than he would be for employment income. c)stock options are illiquid, and ronald may not be able to use them to pay for unexpected bills. d)ronald would be committing stock fraud if he exercises the options.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
There would be no separation between one country’s economy and another’s if the entire world...
Questions
question
World Languages, 17.10.2021 06:30
question
Business, 17.10.2021 06:30
question
Business, 17.10.2021 06:30
question
Mathematics, 17.10.2021 06:30
question
History, 17.10.2021 06:30
question
Mathematics, 17.10.2021 06:30
question
Mathematics, 17.10.2021 06:30
Questions on the website: 13722362