Business, 17.01.2020 06:31 g0606997

Suppose that a firm has a price-earnings ratio which is higher than a value deemed to be normal. investors tend to infer from this information that a. the firm's bonds will increase in their ratings. b. the firm's bonds will decrease in their ratings. c. the firm's stock is over-valued and one should consider selling the stock. d. the firm's stock is under-valued and one should consider buying the stock. e. the firm will be paying increased dividends.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 17:30

Betty contracted with scooby’s skate store to deliver a pair of skates to jake for his birthday. scooby’s owner was going on a trip and delegated the delivery of the skates to brian. brian failed to make delivery.can jake sue brian for breach of contract, as he was not a party to the original contract? explain your answer. brian was not a party to the original contract. why would a court hold him responsible for failing to make delivery? if you do not think a court would hold him responsible, explain your answer. can jake sue scooby’s skates for breach of contract? explain your answer.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 18:30

Health insurance protects you if you experience any of the following except: a: if you have to be hospitalized b: if you damage someone's property c: if you need to visit a clinic d: if you can't work because of illness

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 20:10

Mikkelson corporation's stock had a required return of 12.50% last year, when the risk-free rate was 3% and the market risk premium was 4.75%. then an increase in investor risk aversion caused the market risk premium to rise by 2%. the risk-free rate and the firm's beta remain unchanged. what is the company's new required rate of return? (hint: first calculate the beta, then find the required return.) do not round your intermediate calculations.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:00

Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Suppose that a firm has a price-earnings ratio which is higher than a value deemed to be normal. inv...

Questions