Amarine scientist studying the canary islands concluded that the islands were not formed by volcanic activity because his data showed that the fault on which the islands lies was inactive during the islands' formation. why is using this data considered good science? he uses logical thinking to draw conclusions based on scientific evidence. he selects scientific measurements that cannot be challenged by other scientists. he selects scientific measurements that provide evidence for his hypothesis. he employs logical thinking to critique earlier measurements of the same phenomenon.

Answer

He uses logical thinking to draw conclusion based on scientific evidence

Explanation

Scientific evidence is information gathered from scientific research. This information is objective and unbiased that is documented after conducting a research.  In this case, the evidence presented was that an inactive fault line cannot result to formation of the Canary Island. Previous data has show that an active fault line can trigger volcanic activities leading to formation of islands.

i think that is new experiments yield untrustworthy data and should be carefully considered, because you don't know what will happen with the experiments.

many other transport proteins, often called pumps, move materials against a concentration gradient. active transport drives molecules across a membrane from a region of lower concentration to a region of higher concentration. this process, shown in figure 5.1, uses transport proteins powered by chemi- cal energy.