BRAINLIEST - ANSWER QUICKLY Which of the following statements best defines density-independent limiting factors?

Question 2 options:

Anything that increasingly puts stress on the size of a population as the population gets larger

Anything that puts the same stress on the size of a population regardless of the size of the population

Anything that puts the same stress on the size of a population as the population gets larger

Anything that increasingly puts stress on the size of a population regardless of the size of the population

The second group of limiting factors consists of density-independent limiting factors that affect per capita growth rate independent of how dense the population is.
Image of a forest fire with elk standing in a river for safety.
Image of a forest fire with elk standing in a river for safety.
Image credit: Elk bath by John McColgan, USDA, public domain
As an example, let's consider a wildfire that breaks out in a forest where deer live. The fire will kill any unlucky deer that are present, regardless of population size. An individual deer's chance of dying doesn't depend at all on how many other deer are around. Density-independent limiting factors often take the form of natural disasters, severe weather, and pollution.
Unlike density-dependent limiting factors, density-independent limiting factors alone can’t keep a population at constant levels. That’s because their strength doesn’t depend on the size of the population, so they don’t make a "correction" when the population size gets too large. Instead, they may lead to erratic, abrupt shifts in population size. Small populations may be at risk of getting wiped out by sporadic, density-independent events

Ithink it’s around 500 million or something. kinda scary honestly but that’s just my opinion.